Understanding your vehicle’s diagnostic system is crucial in modern car maintenance and repair. On-Board Diagnostics II (OBD2) is the standardized system that provides access to vehicle data, enabling mechanics and enthusiasts alike to diagnose issues and monitor performance. As a car repair expert at carparteu.com, I’m here to guide you through the intricacies of OBD2 communication protocols, focusing on how manufacturers utilize and adhere to these standards.
While OBD2 is designed to be a universal standard, understanding the nuances of how different manufacturers implement these protocols can be invaluable. This guide will delve into the core OBD2 protocols, their evolution, and what you need to know about manufacturer-specific applications within this framework.
Decoding OBD2: The Basics
OBD2 is essentially your car’s self-reporting system. It’s a standardized protocol mandated in most modern vehicles to monitor emissions and engine performance. This system allows access to crucial data, from simple engine codes to real-time sensor readings, all through a universal OBD2 connector.
You’ve likely encountered OBD2 without realizing it. The “check engine light” on your dashboard is a direct output of the OBD2 system, signaling a detected issue. Mechanics use OBD2 scanners, connecting them to the 16-pin OBD2 port typically located under the dashboard, to communicate with the vehicle’s computer. These scanners send requests using OBD2 protocols, and the car responds with data like speed, engine temperature, or Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs), streamlining the diagnostic process.
Understanding the Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) as part of the OBD2 system.
OBD2 Compatibility Across Car Brands
The question often arises: does my car support OBD2? For most non-electric vehicles manufactured in recent decades, the answer is almost certainly yes. OBD2 became mandatory in the USA for cars and light trucks in 1996, and in the early 2000s for gasoline and diesel cars in the EU. While a 16-pin connector is a strong indicator, older vehicles might have the connector without full OBD2 compliance. The year and region of purchase are key indicators of OBD2 support.
Timeline of OBD2 adoption in different regions to check your car’s compatibility.
A Brief History of OBD2 and its Evolution
OBD2’s origins are rooted in California’s need to control vehicle emissions. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) first required OBD systems in new cars from 1991 onwards. The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) then played a crucial role in standardizing OBD2, defining DTCs and the universal OBD connector (SAE J1962). This standardization is key to understanding “Obd2 Communication Protocols By Manufacturer” because it dictates a common language for diagnostics across different brands.
The rollout of OBD2 was gradual but impactful:
- 1996: OBD2 mandate in the USA for cars/light trucks.
- 2001: EU requirement for gasoline cars (EOBD).
- 2003: EU requirement extended to diesel cars (EOBD).
- 2005: OBD2 required in the US for medium-duty vehicles.
- 2008: US cars mandated to use ISO 15765-4 (CAN) as the OBD2 foundation.
- 2010: OBD2 became mandatory for heavy-duty vehicles in the US.
The historical progression of OBD2, driven by emission control standards.
The Future Landscape of OBD2
OBD2’s future is evolving. Originally designed for emissions testing, its role is being reconsidered with the rise of electric vehicles. Interestingly, EVs are not generally required to support OBD2 in the traditional sense. Many EVs utilize OEM-specific UDS communication protocols, making standard OBD2 tools less effective unless decoding rules are reverse-engineered.
Modern alternatives like WWH-OBD (World Wide Harmonized OBD) and OBDonUDS (OBD on UDS) are emerging to address OBD2’s limitations, especially in data richness and lower-layer protocols. These aim to enhance OBD communication using the UDS protocol as a base, offering a more streamlined and comprehensive diagnostic approach.
The concept of OBD3 introduces telematics to vehicles, envisioning a system where vehicles automatically transmit VIN and DTCs via WiFi to a central server for emission checks and diagnostics. While this promises efficiency, it also raises concerns about data privacy and surveillance.
Another significant trend is the automotive industry’s push to control vehicle data access. Manufacturers are considering “turning off” OBD2 functionality during normal driving, collecting data centrally instead. This move, justified by security concerns (like reducing car hacking risks), is seen by some as a way for manufacturers to monopolize automotive data, potentially disrupting third-party OBD2 service providers.
The changing role of OBD2 in the era of electric vehicles and data access control.
Delving into OBD2 Standards
OBD2 operates as a higher-layer protocol, much like a language, built upon communication methods like CAN bus, which is akin to a phone line. This places OBD2 alongside other CAN-based protocols such as J1939, CANopen, and NMEA 2000. OBD2 standards encompass the connector specifications, lower-layer protocols, and OBD2 Parameter IDs (PIDs).
These standards are structured around the 7-layer OSI model, with both SAE and ISO standards contributing to different layers. This reflects the global nature of OBD2, with SAE standards being prominent in the US and ISO standards often preferred in Europe. Many standards are technically equivalent, like SAE J1979 and ISO 15031-5, or SAE J1962 and ISO 15031-3, ensuring “OBD2 communication protocols by manufacturer” adhere to a globally recognized framework.
The OSI model illustrating the layers of OBD2 and CAN bus standards.
The OBD2 Connector: SAE J1962 Standard
The 16-pin OBD2 connector, defined by SAE J1962 / ISO 15031-3, is your physical interface to your vehicle’s diagnostic data. This connector, often near the steering wheel but sometimes hidden, is standardized for easy access. Key features include:
- Location near the steering wheel, though placement can vary.
- Pin 16 providing battery power, even when the ignition is off.
- Pinout configuration depending on the communication protocol used.
- Common use of CAN bus, utilizing pins 6 (CAN-H) and 14 (CAN-L).
OBD2 Connector Types: A vs. B
You may encounter Type A and Type B OBD2 connectors. Type A is standard in cars, while Type B is more common in medium and heavy-duty vehicles. Both types share similar pinouts but differ in power supply (12V for Type A, 24V for Type B) and often baud rates (500K for cars, 250K for heavy-duty, sometimes 500K in newer models). Type B connectors have a distinguishing interrupted groove, making Type B adapters compatible with both sockets, but Type A adapters only with Type A sockets.
Comparison of OBD2 Connector Type A and Type B, highlighting differences in power and application.
OBD2 and CAN Bus: ISO 15765-4 in Detail
Since 2008, CAN bus has been the mandated lower-layer protocol for OBD2 in US vehicles, as per ISO 15765. ISO 15765-4, also known as Diagnostics over CAN (DoCAN), sets restrictions on the CAN standard (ISO 11898) for diagnostic purposes. Key specifications include:
- CAN bus bit-rate: 250K or 500K.
- CAN IDs: 11-bit or 29-bit.
- Specific CAN IDs for OBD requests/responses.
- Diagnostic CAN frame data length: 8 bytes.
- OBD2 adapter cable length limit: 5 meters.
OBD2 CAN Identifiers: 11-bit and 29-bit
OBD2 communication relies on request and response messages. In most cars, 11-bit CAN IDs are used. The ‘Functional Addressing’ ID 0x7DF is common, broadcasting requests to all OBD2-compatible ECUs. ‘Physical Addressing’ requests to specific ECUs use IDs 0x7E0-0x7E7, though less frequently. ECUs respond with 11-bit IDs 0x7E8-0x7EF, with 0x7E8 (ECM) being the most common.
Some vehicles, especially vans and heavy-duty vehicles, use 29-bit CAN identifiers for OBD2. Here, ‘Functional Addressing’ uses CAN ID 0x18DB33F1, with responses from 0x18DAF100 to 0x18DAF1FF (typically 18DAF110 and 18DAF11E). This response ID is sometimes seen as J1939 PGN 0xDA00 (55808), reserved for ISO 15765-2 in J1939-71.
OBD2 request and response frame structure, showing data flow.
OBD2 vs. Manufacturer-Specific CAN Protocols
It’s critical to understand that while OBD2 provides a standardized interface for diagnostics, car manufacturers rely on their own proprietary CAN protocols for the core functioning of Electronic Control Units (ECUs). These proprietary protocols are specific to brand, model, and year, and are generally inaccessible to third parties without reverse engineering.
When connecting a CAN bus data logger to the OBD2 port, you might observe OEM-specific CAN data alongside OBD2 communication. However, newer vehicles often implement a gateway that restricts OBD2 port access primarily to OBD2 communication, blocking the proprietary data.
Think of OBD2 as an additional, standardized layer on top of the manufacturer’s internal communication network. For “OBD2 communication protocols by manufacturer”, the standard ensures a baseline diagnostic capability across all brands, while manufacturers retain proprietary systems for deeper control and features.
Bit-rate and ID Validation in OBD2
OBD2’s flexibility includes supporting two bit-rates (250K, 500K) and two CAN ID lengths (11-bit, 29-bit), leading to four possible combinations. Modern cars commonly use 500K and 11-bit IDs. Tools should systematically validate these parameters. ISO 15765-4 outlines an initialization sequence to determine the correct combination, relying on the mandatory OBD2 response to a specific request and the detection of CAN error frames when using incorrect bit-rates.
Newer ISO 15765-4 versions also consider OBD communication via OBDonUDS versus OBDonEDS. This article primarily focuses on OBDonEDS (OBD on Emission Diagnostic Service), prevalent in most non-EVs, as opposed to WWH-OBD/OBDonUDS, mainly used in EU trucks/buses. Protocol testing may involve sending UDS requests to identify OBDonUDS support. In practice, OBDonEDS (or OBD2, SAE OBD, EOBD, ISO OBD) is widely used in current non-electric vehicles.
Flowchart illustrating the process of OBD2 bit-rate and CAN ID validation according to ISO 15765-4.
Five Lower-Layer OBD2 Protocols
While CAN bus is dominant today (ISO 15765), older vehicles may use one of four other lower-layer protocols for OBD2. These are important to recognize when working with pre-2008 vehicles. Pinouts can often indicate the protocol in use:
- ISO 15765 (CAN bus): Mandatory in US cars since 2008, now widely used.
- ISO14230-4 (KWP2000): Common in 2003+ Asian cars.
- ISO 9141-2: Used in EU, Chrysler & Asian cars (2000-04).
- SAE J1850 (VPW): Primarily in older GM vehicles.
- SAE J1850 (PWM): Primarily in older Ford vehicles.
ISO-TP: Transporting OBD2 Messages [ISO 15765-2]
All OBD2 data transmission over CAN bus utilizes ISO-TP (ISO 15765-2), a transport protocol that allows for messages exceeding 8 bytes. This is essential for OBD2 functions like retrieving VIN or DTCs. ISO-TP handles segmentation, flow control, and reassembly of these larger messages. For simpler data exchanges within 8 bytes, OBD2 uses ‘Single Frame’ (SF) format, where the first byte indicates payload length, leaving 7 bytes for OBD2 data.
Different frame types in ISO-TP for OBD2 communication, including Single Frame and multi-frame options.
Understanding the OBD2 Diagnostic Message [SAE J1979, ISO 15031-5]
An OBD2 message, in its simplest form within a ‘Single Frame’, comprises an identifier, data length (PCI field), and data. The data section is further broken down into Mode, Parameter ID (PID), and data bytes.
Breakdown of an OBD2 message structure, showing Mode, PID, and data bytes.
OBD2 Request/Response Example
Consider requesting ‘Vehicle Speed’. An OBD2 scanner sends a request to the car (CAN ID 0x7DF) with Mode 0x01 and PID 0x0D. The car responds (CAN ID 0x7E8) with the speed value in the data bytes. For instance, a response with data byte 0x32 translates to a vehicle speed of 50 km/h after applying OBD2 PID decoding rules.
Example of an OBD2 request and response sequence for Vehicle Speed.
Details of OBD2 PID 0x0D for Vehicle Speed, showing request and response data.
The 10 OBD2 Services (Modes)
OBD2 defines 10 diagnostic services, or modes. Mode 0x01 provides real-time data, while others manage DTCs or freeze frame data. Not all vehicles support every mode, and manufacturers can implement OEM-specific modes beyond these ten. In messages, the mode is the second byte, with responses typically adding 0x40 to the requested mode (e.g., request 0x01, response 0x41).
OBD2 Parameter IDs (PIDs)
Within each OBD2 mode are Parameter IDs (PIDs). Mode 0x01, for example, includes around 200 standardized PIDs for real-time data like speed, RPM, and fuel level. However, vehicles typically support only a subset of these.
PID 0x00 in mode 0x01 is crucial. If an ECU supports OBD2, it must support mode 0x01 PID 0x00. Responding to this PID, the ECU indicates support for PIDs 0x01-0x20. This makes PID 0x00 a fundamental OBD2 compatibility test. Similarly, PIDs 0x20, 0x40, and so on, reveal support for subsequent PID ranges in mode 0x01.
OBD2 request and response frame structure highlighting PID data parameters.
OBD2 PID Overview Tools
SAE J1979 and ISO 15031-5 appendices detail scaling information for standard OBD2 PIDs, essential for converting raw data into physical values. For quick PID lookups, online tools are invaluable. These tools aid in constructing OBD2 requests and dynamically decoding responses, simplifying the process of accessing and interpreting “OBD2 communication protocols by manufacturer” data.
OBD2 PID overview tool
Practical Guide: Logging and Decoding OBD2 Data
Let’s look at a practical example of logging OBD2 data using tools like the CANedge CAN bus data logger. These tools allow configuration for custom CAN frame transmission, making them suitable for OBD2 logging.
Connecting a CANedge to your vehicle via an OBD2-DB9 adapter cable enables data capture. The process typically involves:
Setting up an OBD2 data logger to request PID data.
Reviewing responses to ‘Supported PIDs’ requests.
Step-by-step OBD2 Data Logging
#1: Bit-rate, ID, and PID Validation:
- Test at 500K bit-rate; if unsuccessful, try 250K.
- Use the validated bit-rate for communication.
- Send ‘Supported PIDs’ requests and analyze responses.
- Determine 11-bit or 29-bit IDs based on response IDs.
- Identify supported PIDs from response data.
Plug-and-play configurations often streamline these tests. Most post-2008 non-EV cars support 40-80 PIDs via 500K, 11-bit CAN IDs, and OBDonEDS protocol. Multiple responses to a single OBD request are common due to the 0x7DF request ID polling all ECUs. Using ‘Physical Addressing’ (e.g., 0x7E0) can reduce busload by targeting specific ECUs.
#2: Configuring OBD2 PID Requests:
- Use ‘Physical Addressing’ request IDs (e.g., 0x7E0) to minimize responses.
- Space requests 300-500 ms apart to avoid ECU overload.
- Implement triggers to stop transmissions when the vehicle is inactive to prevent battery drain.
- Apply filters to record only OBD2 responses, especially if OEM-specific CAN data is also present.
Example configuration for OBD2 PID requests on a CANedge device.
Visualizing DBC decoded OBD2 data using asammdf.
#3: DBC Decoding of Raw OBD2 Data:
To analyze logged data, decode raw OBD2 data into physical values. ISO 15031-5/SAE J1979 and resources like Wikipedia provide decoding information. A free OBD2 DBC file simplifies DBC decoding in CAN bus software.
Decoding OBD2 data is complex due to multiplexing—different PIDs share the same CAN ID (e.g., 0x7E8). Decoding requires considering CAN ID, OBD2 mode, and PID. This ‘extended multiplexing’ can be managed using DBC files.
CANedge: Your OBD2 Data Logger
The CANedge is an excellent tool for logging OBD2 data directly to an SD card. It’s simple to connect and use, and data can be analyzed via free software/APIs and the OBD2 DBC file.
OBD2 logger intro CANedge
Multi-Frame OBD2 Examples [ISO-TP]
Most OBD2 communication is single-frame, but multi-frame communication is necessary for larger data sets, using ISO-TP. This involves flow control frames.
Example 1: Retrieving Vehicle Identification Number (VIN)
VIN retrieval uses OBD2 mode 0x09 and PID 0x02. The process involves a multi-frame exchange:
Example 2: Multi-PID Request (6x)
OBD2 allows requesting up to 6 mode 0x01 PIDs in one request. While efficient, this complicates data decoding and is not generally recommended for standard logging due to DBC file limitations.
Example 3: Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs)
Requesting DTCs uses mode 0x03. Responses can be multi-frame if multiple DTCs are stored. DTCs are 2-byte codes, categorized and detailed in ISO 15031-5/ISO 15031-6. Decoded DTC values can be looked up using online tools.
DTC decoding example, showing category and code interpretation.
OBD2 Data Logging: Real-World Use Cases
OBD2 data logging has diverse applications:
Car Data Logging
For fuel efficiency, driving improvement, prototype testing, and insurance telematics.
obd2 logger
Real-time Car Diagnostics
Stream OBD2 data for live vehicle health monitoring and issue diagnosis.
obd2 streaming
Predictive Maintenance
Utilize IoT OBD2 loggers for cloud-based vehicle monitoring to predict and prevent failures.
predictive maintenance
Vehicle Black Box Logger
OBD2 loggers serve as ‘black boxes’ for incident analysis and diagnostics.
can bus blackbox
Have an OBD2 data logging application? Contact us for expert consultation!
Contact us
Explore our guides for more insights, or download the ‘Ultimate Guide’ PDF.
Ready to log or stream OBD2 data?
Get your OBD2 data logger now!
Buy now Contact us
Recommended for you
OBD2 DATA LOGGER: EASILY LOG & CONVERT OBD2 DATA
CANEDGE2 – PRO CAN IoT LOGGER
[
