What Year Was OBD2 Mandatory? The Definitive Guide to On-Board Diagnostics

Need a clear and comprehensive understanding of OBD2 and when it became a must-have feature in vehicles? You’ve come to the right place.

This guide provides a deep dive into the On-Board Diagnostics (OBD2) protocol, covering everything from the OBD2 connector and parameter IDs (PIDs) to its crucial link with the CAN bus system. We’ll not only answer the key question – What Year Was Obd2 Mandatory? – but also explore the fascinating history, present applications, and future trends of this essential automotive technology.

This is more than just a simple overview; it’s a practical exploration designed to equip you with the knowledge to understand and utilize OBD2 effectively. Discover why this article is becoming the go-to resource for anyone seeking to understand OBD2.

You can also enhance your learning experience by watching our introductory OBD2 video or downloading this guide in PDF format.

Unpacking OBD2: Your Car’s Diagnostic Center

OBD2, short for On-Board Diagnostics version 2, is essentially your car’s internal health monitoring system. It’s a standardized protocol implemented in vehicles to provide self-diagnostic and reporting capabilities. Through the OBD2 connector, mechanics and car owners alike can access a wealth of information, including diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) and real-time data about vehicle performance.

You’re likely already familiar with OBD2 in some form, even if you didn’t realize it:

That “check engine light” or malfunction indicator light on your dashboard? That’s OBD2 in action, alerting you to a potential issue under the hood.

When you take your car to a mechanic because of this light, the first thing they’ll typically do is use an OBD2 scanner. This tool plugs into the OBD2 16-pin connector, usually located near the steering wheel. The scanner sends standardized ‘OBD2 requests’ to the car’s computer system. In response, the car sends back ‘OBD2 responses’ containing valuable data like speed, fuel level, and those all-important Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs). This streamlined communication allows for faster and more accurate troubleshooting, saving time and money on repairs.

Alt text: Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) illuminated on a car dashboard, representing OBD2’s alert system for vehicle issues.

OBD2 Compatibility: Is Your Car Equipped?

The question on many minds is: Does my car actually support OBD2?

The good news is, for most modern non-electric vehicles, the answer is almost certainly yes! OBD2 has become the industry standard, and the vast majority of cars manufactured in recent decades are equipped with it, often running on the CAN bus communication protocol.

However, for older vehicles, things can be a bit less clear-cut. Just because you spot a 16-pin OBD2 connector doesn’t automatically guarantee OBD2 compliance. Some older cars may have this connector but utilize a different diagnostic protocol. A reliable way to determine OBD2 compliance is to consider where and when the vehicle was initially purchased as new.

Alt text: Chart illustrating OBD2 compliance based on vehicle purchase location (US, EU) and year, highlighting mandatory implementation timelines.

The History of OBD2: Tracing its Roots and Rise to Mandate

To truly understand what year OBD2 became mandatory, we need to delve into its history. The story of OBD2 begins in California, driven by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). In the late 1980s and early 1990s, CARB recognized the need for improved vehicle emission control and diagnostics. As a result, they mandated the introduction of On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) in all new cars sold in California starting from 1991. This initial OBD system was a precursor to the more standardized OBD2.

Building upon this foundation, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) played a pivotal role in shaping OBD2. The SAE recommended a standardized protocol, addressing inconsistencies in the early OBD implementations across different manufacturers. This led to the development of OBD2, which standardized diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs), the data connector, and communication protocols. The SAE J1962 standard defined the now-familiar 16-pin OBD2 connector, ensuring compatibility across various vehicle makes and models.

From its Californian origins, the OBD2 standard gradually expanded, becoming a nationwide and then international requirement. Here’s a step-by-step timeline marking the key milestones in the rollout of OBD2 and, crucially, pinpointing what year OBD2 became mandatory in different regions and vehicle categories:

1996: OBD2 Mandate in the USA for Cars and Light Trucks: This is the answer to “what year was OBD2 mandatory in the USA?” In 1996, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandated OBD2 for all new cars and light trucks sold in the US. This was a major turning point, establishing OBD2 as a standard feature in the American automotive market.
2001: OBD2 Required in the EU for Gasoline Cars (EOBD): The European Union followed suit, making OBD2 mandatory for all new gasoline-powered passenger cars sold within the EU starting in 2001. In Europe, OBD2 is often referred to as EOBD (European On-Board Diagnostics).
2003: EOBD Requirement Extended to Diesel Cars in the EU: Two years later, in 2003, the EU extended the EOBD mandate to include diesel-powered passenger cars as well, ensuring comprehensive diagnostic coverage across vehicle types.
2005: OBD2 Mandate for Medium-Duty Vehicles in the US: The US further expanded the OBD2 requirement in 2005 to include medium-duty vehicles, broadening its scope beyond just passenger cars and light trucks.
2008: CAN Bus as Mandatory OBD2 Protocol in the US: A significant technical update occurred in 2008 when the US mandated the use of ISO 15765-4 (CAN) as the foundation for OBD2 communication in all vehicles sold in the US. This standardized the communication protocol, enhancing interoperability and efficiency.
2010: OBD2 Required for Heavy-Duty Vehicles in the US: Finally, in 2010, the OBD2 mandate in the US reached its full breadth, encompassing heavy-duty vehicles as well. This solidified OBD2 as the universal diagnostic standard for virtually all vehicles in the United States.

This historical progression clearly outlines what year OBD2 became mandatory for different vehicle types and regions, highlighting its evolution from a California initiative to a global automotive standard.

Alt text: Graphical depiction of OBD2 history, emphasizing its role in emission control and its connection to CAN bus technology.

Alt text: Timeline infographic summarizing the key dates in OBD2 history, from its Californian origins to global mandates and standardization.

Alt text: Visual representation of OBD3 and the future of OBD, highlighting trends like remote diagnostics, emissions testing, cloud connectivity, and IoT integration.

The Future of OBD2: Trends and Transformations

While OBD2 is firmly established, it’s not static. The automotive landscape is constantly evolving, and OBD2 is adapting to meet new challenges and opportunities. Let’s explore some key trends shaping the OBD2 future:

Initially conceived for emissions control and testing, legislated OBD2 faces a paradigm shift with the rise of electric vehicles (EVs). Interestingly, current regulations don’t mandate OBD2 support for EVs in the same way as for internal combustion engine vehicles. This is reflected in the fact that many modern EVs don’t fully support standard OBD2 requests. Instead, they often rely on OEM-specific UDS (Unified Diagnostic Services) communication protocols. This shift can make accessing data from EVs more complex, often requiring reverse engineering to decode proprietary data formats. However, initiatives are underway to bridge this gap, as seen in case studies for brands like Tesla, Hyundai/Kia, Nissan, and VW/Skoda, which are exploring ways to access EV data.

Recognizing the limitations of current OBD2 implementations in terms of data richness and lower-layer protocols, the automotive industry is developing advanced alternatives. WWH-OBD (World Wide Harmonized OBD) and OBDonUDS (OBD on UDS) are emerging protocols designed to enhance and streamline OBD communication by leveraging the UDS protocol as a foundation. These advancements aim to address the evolving diagnostic needs of modern vehicles. For a deeper understanding of these protocols, resources like introductions to UDS are available.

In our increasingly connected world, traditional OBD2 testing methods are becoming less efficient. Manually performing emission control checks is time-consuming and costly. The solution on the horizon is OBD3, which envisions integrating telematics into all vehicles.

OBD3 proposes adding a small radio transponder to vehicles, similar to those used for bridge tolls. This technology would enable vehicles to wirelessly transmit their vehicle identification number (VIN) and DTCs to a central server for automated checks, potentially via WiFi.

Many existing devices already facilitate the transfer of CAN or OBD2 data via WiFi or cellular networks, such as the CANedge2 WiFi CAN logger and the CANedge3 3G/4G CAN logger. While offering convenience and cost savings, OBD3 also raises political and privacy concerns related to vehicle surveillance.

While OBD2 was originally designed for stationary emission controls, its applications have expanded dramatically. Today, third-party services extensively utilize OBD2 for real-time data generation through OBD2 dongles, CAN loggers, and other devices. However, the German car industry is advocating for changes that could restrict this third-party access.

The argument, as voiced by Christoph Grote, SVP Electronics at BMW in 2017, is that “OBD has been designed to service cars in repair shops. In no way has it been intended to allow third parties to build a form of data-driven economy on the access through this interface.”

The proposal involves potentially “turning off” OBD2 functionality during normal driving, centralizing data collection within manufacturer-controlled servers. This move aims to give manufacturers greater control over ‘automotive big data’ and is justified by security concerns, such as mitigating the risk of car hacking. However, many perceive this as a commercially motivated strategy to control access to valuable vehicle data, potentially disrupting the market for third-party OBD2 services. Whether this trend gains momentum remains to be seen, but it could significantly reshape the OBD2 landscape.

Alt text: Conceptual image representing the potential future trend of electric vehicles limiting or blocking access to data via the OBD2 connector.

Enhance Your Expertise: The Ultimate CAN Guide

Ready to become a CAN bus expert and deepen your OBD2 knowledge?

Our comprehensive ‘Ultimate CAN Guide’ consolidates 12 insightful introductions into a single, 160+ page PDF resource.

Download now

Decoding OBD2 Standards: A Layered Approach

On-board diagnostics, OBD2, operates as a higher-layer protocol, much like a language, built upon a communication method. In the context of vehicles, CAN (Controller Area Network) bus serves as this communication method, analogous to a phone line. This hierarchical structure positions OBD2 alongside other CAN-based higher-layer protocols like J1939, CANopen, and NMEA 2000, each designed for specific applications within vehicle networks.

Specifically, OBD2 standards meticulously define various aspects, including the OBD2 connector itself, the lower-layer communication protocols it utilizes, OBD2 parameter IDs (PIDs) for data access, and much more.

These standards can be effectively visualized using the 7-layer OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) model, a conceptual framework for understanding network communication. As we delve into the standards, you’ll notice that both SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) and ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standards are referenced across different layers. This reflects the global nature of OBD2 standardization, with SAE standards originating primarily in the USA and ISO standards representing international consensus. Notably, many SAE and ISO standards in the OBD2 realm are technically equivalent, such as SAE J1979 and ISO 15031-5 (defining diagnostic services), and SAE J1962 and ISO 15031-3 (specifying the OBD2 connector).

Alt text: OSI 7-layer model diagram illustrating the relationship between OBD2 and CAN bus standards, highlighting relevant ISO and SAE specifications.

Alt text: OBD2 Connector Pinout diagram, Type A female socket, detailing pin assignments for various signals and protocols.

The OBD2 Connector: Your Gateway to Vehicle Data [SAE J1962]

The ubiquitous 16-pin OBD2 connector serves as the physical interface for accessing your car’s diagnostic data. Standardized under SAE J1962 (and ISO 15031-3), this connector provides a consistent and readily accessible point for diagnostic tools to interface with vehicle systems.

The illustration provides a detailed view of a Type A OBD2 pin connector, often referred to as the Data Link Connector (DLC). Here are some key features and considerations regarding the OBD2 connector:

Location: While typically located near the steering wheel for easy access, the OBD2 connector can sometimes be hidden behind panels or in less obvious locations.
Power Supply: Pin 16 is dedicated to providing battery power, often remaining active even when the ignition is switched off. This allows diagnostic tools to operate and retrieve data without the engine running.
Pinout Variability: The specific pinout configuration of the OBD2 connector can vary depending on the communication protocol used by the vehicle.
CAN Bus Connection: In vehicles utilizing CAN bus as the lower-layer protocol (which is increasingly common), pins 6 (CAN-High) and 14 (CAN-Low) are typically connected, facilitating CAN communication through the OBD2 interface.

OBD2 Connector Types: A vs. B

In practical applications, you might encounter two primary types of OBD2 connectors: Type A and Type B. Type A is the more common variant, predominantly found in passenger cars and light-duty vehicles. Type B connectors are typically used in medium and heavy-duty vehicles, reflecting different power and communication requirements.

While both Type A and Type B connectors share a similar pinout structure for diagnostic signals, key distinctions exist:

Power Supply: Type A connectors typically provide a 12V power supply, suitable for passenger car electronics. Type B connectors, designed for heavier vehicles, offer a 24V power supply.
Baud Rate: Communication speed, or baud rate, can also differ. Cars commonly use a 500K baud rate, while heavy-duty vehicles often use 250K, although 500K support is becoming more prevalent in newer heavy-duty applications.

Visually distinguishing between Type A and Type B OBD2 sockets is aided by a physical feature: Type B connectors incorporate an interrupted groove in the middle of the connector face. This groove is designed to ensure compatibility and prevent mismatches. A Type B OBD2 adapter cable is engineered to be compatible with both Type A and Type B sockets, providing broader applicability. However, a Type A adapter cable will physically not fit into a Type B socket due to the groove.

Alt text: Diagram contrasting OBD2 Connector Type A and Type B, highlighting differences in voltage (12V vs 24V) and physical characteristics (groove in Type B).

Alt text: Diagram illustrating the relationship between OBD2 and CAN bus according to ISO 15765 standards, emphasizing CAN bus as the physical layer for OBD2 communication.

OBD2 and CAN Bus: The Communication Backbone [ISO 15765-4]

Since 2008, CAN bus has become the mandatory lower-layer protocol for OBD2 in all vehicles sold in the United States, as mandated by ISO 15765. This standardization marks a significant shift towards CAN bus as the dominant communication network for vehicle diagnostics.

ISO 15765-4, also known as Diagnostics over CAN or DoCAN, is a specific implementation of the CAN standard (ISO 11898) tailored for OBD2 diagnostics. It imposes a set of constraints and specifications on the CAN protocol to ensure reliable and interoperable diagnostic communication. ISO 15765-4 primarily standardizes the CAN interface for diagnostic test equipment, focusing on the physical layer, data link layer, and network layer of the OSI model. Key specifications within ISO 15765-4 include:

Bit Rate: The CAN bus bit rate for OBD2 communication must be either 250 Kbps or 500 Kbps. These standardized bit rates ensure compatibility between diagnostic tools and vehicles.
CAN Identifiers: Both 11-bit (standard) and 29-bit (extended) CAN identifiers are permitted for OBD2 communication, providing flexibility in addressing and message prioritization.
CAN ID Allocation: Specific CAN IDs are reserved and standardized for OBD requests and responses, ensuring proper message routing and interpretation within the vehicle network.
Data Payload Length: Diagnostic CAN frames for OBD2 are restricted to a data payload length of 8 bytes. This limitation is inherited from the CAN standard and influences the structure of OBD2 messages.
Cable Length: The OBD2 adapter cable connecting the diagnostic tool to the vehicle’s OBD2 connector must not exceed 5 meters in length to maintain signal integrity and reliable communication.

OBD2 CAN Identifiers: 11-bit and 29-bit Addressing

OBD2 communication fundamentally relies on a request-response mechanism. A diagnostic tool sends a request message, and the vehicle’s electronic control units (ECUs) respond with the requested data or diagnostic information.

In most passenger cars, 11-bit CAN IDs are predominantly used for OBD2 communication. Within this addressing scheme, the ‘Functional Addressing’ CAN ID 0x7DF plays a crucial role. This ID acts as a broadcast request, targeting all OBD2-compliant ECUs within the vehicle. It essentially asks all relevant ECUs if they have data to report concerning the requested parameter. Conversely, CAN IDs in the range 0x7E0-0x7E7 are reserved for ‘Physical Addressing’ requests. These IDs allow a diagnostic tool to target a specific ECU for a request, although functional addressing (0x7DF) is more commonly used for general OBD2 inquiries.

ECUs respond to OBD2 requests using 11-bit CAN IDs in the range 0x7E8-0x7EF. The most frequently encountered response ID is 0x7E8, which typically originates from the ECM (Engine Control Module), the primary ECU responsible for engine management and emissions control. Another common response ID is 0x7E9, often associated with the TCM (Transmission Control Module).

In certain vehicle categories, particularly vans and light, medium, and heavy-duty vehicles, extended 29-bit CAN identifiers may be employed for OBD2 communication instead of the standard 11-bit IDs.

When 29-bit CAN IDs are used, the ‘Functional Addressing’ CAN ID becomes 0x18DB33F1. This ID serves the same broadcast purpose as 0x7DF in 11-bit addressing, querying all OBD2-compliant ECUs. If a vehicle responds using 29-bit IDs, responses are typically observed with CAN IDs ranging from 0x18DAF100 to 0x18DAF1FF, with common examples being 0x18DAF110 and 0x18DAF11E. These response IDs can also be represented in the ‘J1939 PGN’ (Parameter Group Number) format. Specifically, the PGN 0xDA00 (55808), as defined in the J1939-71 standard, is designated as ‘Reserved for ISO 15765-2’, indicating its role in OBD2 communication using 29-bit CAN IDs.

Alt text: Diagram illustrating the OBD2 request-response communication flow, highlighting the roles of request frames, response frames, PIDs (Parameter IDs), and data parameters.

Alt text: Diagram contrasting OBD2 standard CAN bus communication with OEM-specific proprietary CAN bus protocols, emphasizing the separate nature of these systems within a vehicle.

OBD2 vs. Proprietary CAN Protocols: Understanding the Difference

It’s crucial to understand that your vehicle’s electronic control units (ECUs) operate and communicate using their own proprietary CAN protocols, independently of OBD2. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) develop and implement these proprietary CAN protocols for the core functions of the vehicle, including engine control, transmission management, braking systems, and body electronics. These protocols are often specific to the vehicle brand, model, and year, and their detailed specifications are typically not publicly available. Unless you are the OEM or have access to their proprietary documentation, interpreting this raw CAN data directly can be extremely challenging, often requiring specialized reverse engineering techniques.

When you connect a CAN bus data logger to your vehicle’s OBD2 connector, you may observe both OBD2 communication and OEM-specific CAN data traffic on the CAN bus network accessible through the OBD2 port. OEM-specific CAN data is often broadcast at high rates, typically 1000-2000 frames per second, representing the real-time communication between ECUs for vehicle operation. However, in many newer vehicles, a gateway module is implemented within the vehicle network architecture. This gateway acts as a filter and security barrier, often blocking direct access to the OEM-specific CAN data through the OBD2 connector. The gateway is designed to primarily allow and facilitate standardized OBD2 communication via the OBD2 port, while restricting access to the more sensitive and proprietary OEM CAN data.

In essence, think of OBD2 as an ‘additional’ higher-layer protocol that operates in parallel with the OEM-specific protocol. OBD2 is specifically designed for standardized diagnostic access and emissions-related information, while the OEM protocol governs the core operational communication within the vehicle’s electronic systems. They coexist on the CAN bus network but serve distinct purposes and often have different levels of accessibility.

Bit-Rate and ID Validation: Ensuring Correct Communication

As previously mentioned, OBD2 communication can utilize one of two bit rates (250 Kbps or 500 Kbps) and either 11-bit or 29-bit CAN IDs. This combination results in four potential protocol configurations that a diagnostic tool might need to consider when establishing communication with a vehicle. In contemporary vehicles, 500 Kbps bit rate and 11-bit CAN IDs are the most prevalent combination for OBD2, but diagnostic tools should employ a systematic approach to automatically detect and validate the correct configuration for each vehicle.

ISO 15765-4 provides recommendations for a standardized initialization sequence to determine the appropriate bit rate and CAN ID format for OBD2 communication. This sequence, often visualized as a flowchart, leverages the fact that all OBD2-compliant vehicles must respond to a specific mandatory OBD2 request – the ‘Service 0x01 PID 0x00’ request (discussed in detail in the OBD2 PID section). The validation process also relies on detecting CAN error frames. Transmitting CAN data with an incorrect bit rate will result in communication errors and the generation of CAN error frames on the bus. Diagnostic tools can monitor for these error frames to identify if the selected bit rate is mismatched.

More recent revisions of ISO 15765-4 acknowledge that vehicles may implement OBD communication via OBDonUDS (OBD on Unified Diagnostic Services) rather than the traditional OBDonEDS (OBD on Emission Diagnostic Service as per ISO 15031-5/SAE J1979). While this article primarily focuses on OBD2/OBDonEDS, understanding the distinction is important. WWH-OBD (World Wide Harmonized OBD) and OBDonUDS, as defined in ISO 14229 and ISO 27145-3/SAE J1979-2, represent a more modern approach to OBD communication, particularly in European trucks and buses.

To differentiate between OBDonEDS and OBDonUDS protocols, a diagnostic tool can perform additional protocol detection steps. Specifically, it can send UDS requests using 11-bit or 29-bit functional address IDs for service 0x22 (Read Data By Identifier) and data identifier (DID) 0xF810 (protocol identification). Vehicles that support OBDonUDS are required to have ECUs that respond to this specific DID, allowing the diagnostic tool to identify OBDonUDS support.

In practical terms, OBDonEDS (often referred to as OBD2, SAE OBD, EOBD, or ISO OBD) remains the dominant protocol in most non-electric passenger cars today. WWH-OBD/OBDonUDS is primarily encountered in EU trucks and buses and is gradually expanding into other vehicle segments as diagnostic standards evolve.

Alt text: Flowchart illustrating the OBD2 bit-rate and CAN ID validation process as per ISO 15765-4, outlining the steps to automatically determine the correct communication parameters.

Alt text: Diagram showcasing the five lower-layer protocols used for OBD2 communication: CAN (ISO 15765), KWP2000 (ISO 14230-4), ISO 9141-2, SAE J1850 (VPW), and SAE J1850 (PWM), highlighting CAN as the dominant modern protocol.

Five Lower-Layer OBD2 Protocols: Beyond CAN Bus

While CAN bus (ISO 15765) is the prevailing lower-layer protocol for OBD2 in modern vehicles, particularly those manufactured post-2008, it’s important to acknowledge the existence of four other lower-layer protocols that were previously used as the foundation for OBD2 communication. If you are working with older vehicles (pre-2008), understanding these alternative protocols can be valuable for diagnostic purposes. The OBD2 connector pinout itself can sometimes provide clues about which protocol might be in use in an older vehicle. The five lower-layer OBD2 protocols are:

ISO 15765 (CAN bus): As discussed, CAN bus is mandatory in US vehicles since 2008 and is the dominant protocol in the vast majority of vehicles manufactured today.
ISO 14230-4 (KWP2000): The Keyword Protocol 2000 (KWP2000) was a commonly used protocol in vehicles manufactured around 2003 and later, particularly in Asian markets.
ISO 9141-2: ISO 9141-2 was prevalent in European, Chrysler, and Asian vehicles manufactured in the early 2000s (approximately 2000-2004).
SAE J1850 (VPW – Variable Pulse Width Modulation): SAE J1850 VPW was primarily used in older General Motors (GM) vehicles.
SAE J1850 (PWM – Pulse Width Modulation): SAE J1850 PWM was predominantly used in older Ford vehicles.

ISO-TP: Transporting OBD2 Messages [ISO 15765-2]

All OBD2 data communication over CAN bus relies on a transport protocol called ISO-TP (ISO 15765-2). This transport protocol is essential because it enables the transmission of data payloads that exceed the 8-byte limit of a standard CAN frame. In the context of OBD2, multi-frame communication is necessary for certain diagnostic services, such as retrieving the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) or Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs), which often require more than 8 bytes of data. ISO 15765-2 provides mechanisms for segmentation (dividing large data payloads into multiple CAN frames), flow control (managing the transmission rate and data flow between devices), and reassembly (reconstructing the original data payload from multiple CAN frames). For a more in-depth understanding of ISO-TP and its functionalities, resources like introductions to UDS (Unified Diagnostic Services) can be helpful, as UDS also utilizes ISO-TP for multi-frame communication.

However, in many OBD2 communication scenarios, the data being exchanged can fit within a single CAN frame. In these cases, ISO 15765-2 specifies the use of a ‘Single Frame’ (SF) format. In a Single Frame, the first data byte of the CAN frame, known as the PCI (Protocol Control Information) field, contains the payload length (excluding any padding bytes). This leaves the remaining 7 bytes of the CAN frame data payload available for OBD2-related communication.

Alt text: Diagram illustrating ISO 15765-2 frame types for OBD2 communication, including Single Frame (SF), First Frame (FF), Consecutive Frame (CF), and Flow Control (FC) frames, and their roles in data transport.

The OBD2 Diagnostic Message: Structure and Components [SAE J1979, ISO 15031-5]

To gain a deeper understanding of OBD2 communication over CAN, let’s examine the structure of a raw ‘Single Frame’ OBD2 CAN message. In simplified terms, an OBD2 message is composed of three primary elements: a CAN identifier, a data length indicator (PCI field), and the actual data payload. The data payload itself is further structured into components: Mode, Parameter ID (PID), and data bytes.

Alt text: Breakdown of an OBD2 message structure, highlighting the components: CAN ID, PCI field (data length), Mode, PID (Parameter ID), and Data Bytes, explaining their roles in message interpretation.

Example: OBD2 Request/Response Sequence

Before dissecting each component of the OBD2 message, let’s consider a practical example: a request and response for the ‘Vehicle Speed’ parameter.

In this scenario, an external diagnostic tool initiates communication by sending a request message to the vehicle. This request message utilizes CAN ID 0x7DF (functional addressing) and contains a 2-byte payload: Mode 0x01 (Show current data) and PID 0x0D (Vehicle Speed). The vehicle’s ECU, specifically the Engine Control Module (ECM), responds with a message using CAN ID 0x7E8 and a 3-byte payload. This response payload includes the value of Vehicle Speed encoded in the 4th byte of the CAN frame (data byte 1 in the OBD2 payload), which in this example is 0x32. Converting 0x32 from hexadecimal to decimal yields 50.

By consulting the OBD2 PID specifications and decoding rules for PID 0x0D (Vehicle Speed), we can determine that the value 50 represents a physical speed of 50 km/h. This example illustrates the fundamental request-response interaction in OBD2 communication and how PIDs are used to request specific parameters.

In the following sections, we will delve into the details of OBD2 modes and PIDs to provide a comprehensive understanding of these key components.

Alt text: Example of an OBD2 request and response message exchange for Vehicle Speed (PID 0x0D), showing CAN IDs (7DF request, 7E8 response) and payload data.

Alt text: Detailed example of OBD2 PID 0x0D (Vehicle Speed), illustrating the PID, data encoding, and conversion to a physical value (km/h).

Alt text: Overview of the 10 OBD2 service modes (diagnostic services), including modes for current data, freeze frame data, clearing DTCs, and other diagnostic functions.

The 10 OBD2 Services (Modes): Accessing Diagnostic Functions

OBD2 defines 10 standardized diagnostic services, also commonly referred to as modes. These services provide a structured way to access various diagnostic functionalities within a vehicle’s OBD2 system. Each service is identified by a unique mode number, ranging from 0x01 to 0x0A (1 to 10 in decimal). Here’s a brief overview of some key OBD2 services:

Mode 0x01: Show current data: This mode is used to request and retrieve real-time data parameters from the vehicle’s sensors and systems. It provides access to a wide range of dynamic information, such as engine speed (RPM), vehicle speed, coolant temperature, oxygen sensor readings, and many other parameters.
Mode 0x02: Show freeze frame data: When an emissions-related fault code (DTC) is set, the vehicle’s ECU typically stores a ‘freeze frame’ of data. This freeze frame captures the values of various parameters at the moment the fault occurred. Mode 0x02 allows retrieval of this freeze frame data, providing valuable context for diagnosing intermittent issues.
Mode 0x03: Show stored Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs): This mode is used to request and retrieve a list of currently stored Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) that indicate active emissions-related faults.
Mode 0x04: Clear Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) and stored values: Mode 0x04 allows a diagnostic tool to clear stored DTCs and reset certain learned values within the vehicle’s ECU. It’s important to use this mode with caution, as clearing DTCs without addressing the underlying issue may mask problems.
Mode 0x09: Request vehicle information: Mode 0x09 is used to request vehicle-specific information, such as the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), calibration IDs, and component IDs.

It’s important to note that vehicles are not required to support all 10 OBD2 modes. The level of mode support can vary depending on the vehicle manufacturer, model, and year. Furthermore, some manufacturers may implement OEM-specific OBD2 modes beyond the 10 standardized modes to provide access to additional diagnostic functions or proprietary data.

In OBD2 messages, the mode number is typically located in the second byte of the data payload. In a request message, the mode is included directly (e.g., 0x01 for Mode 01). However, in a response message, 0x40 is added to the mode number (e.g., a response to a Mode 0x01 request will typically have a mode byte of 0x41). This offset helps distinguish between request and response messages.

OBD2 Parameter IDs (PIDs): Requesting Specific Data

Within each OBD2 mode, Parameter IDs (PIDs) are used to specify the particular data parameter being requested or reported. PIDs are numeric codes that identify specific sensors, actuators, calculated values, or diagnostic information.

For example, within Mode 0x01 (Show current data), there are approximately 200 standardized PIDs defined. These PIDs cover a wide range of real-time data parameters related to engine performance, emissions, and vehicle systems. Examples of common Mode 0x01 PIDs include:

PID 0x0C: Engine RPM
PID 0x0D: Vehicle Speed
PID 0x04: Calculated Engine Load
PID 0x05: Engine Coolant Temperature
PID 0x0A: Fuel Pressure
PID 0x0B: Intake Manifold Absolute Pressure

However, it’s crucial to understand that a vehicle does not have to support all standardized OBD2 PIDs within a given mode. In practice, most vehicles only support a subset of the available PIDs. The specific PIDs supported by a vehicle vary depending on the manufacturer, model, and the vehicle’s emissions control systems.

In this context, PID 0x00 within Mode 0x01 holds a special significance. The OBD2 standard mandates that if an emissions-related ECU supports any OBD2 services at all, then it must support Mode 0x01 PID 0x00. When a diagnostic tool sends a Mode 0x01 PID 0x00 request, the vehicle ECU responds by providing a bitmask that indicates which PIDs in the range 0x01-0x20 it supports. This makes PID 0x00 a fundamental tool for OBD2 compatibility testing. By querying PID 0x00, a diagnostic tool can quickly determine if an ECU is OBD2 compliant and which basic PIDs it supports. Similarly, PIDs 0x20, 0x40, 0x60, 0x80, 0xA0, and 0xC0 within Mode 0x01 can be used to determine support for subsequent PID ranges (0x21-0x40, 0x41-0x60, and so on) within Mode 0x01.

Alt text: Diagram reiterating the OBD2 request-response process, emphasizing the role of PIDs in specifying data parameters within request and response frames.

Alt text: Screenshot of an OBD2 PID overview tool, showcasing a user interface for browsing and selecting OBD2 PIDs within service mode 01, facilitating PID discovery and data interpretation.

Tip: Leveraging an OBD2 PID Overview Tool

The appendices of the SAE J1979 and ISO 15031-5 standards documents contain detailed scaling and decoding information for standardized OBD2 PIDs. This information is essential for converting the raw data bytes received in OBD2 responses into meaningful physical values (e.g., converting raw sensor readings into degrees Celsius or km/h). Understanding how to decode CAN data, as explained in resources like CAN bus introductions, is crucial for working with OBD2 data.

To simplify the process of working with Mode 0x01 PIDs, consider using an OBD2 PID overview tool. These tools provide a user-friendly interface for browsing and searching through the extensive list of standardized PIDs. They often include built-in decoding rules and scaling factors, allowing you to easily construct OBD2 request frames for specific PIDs and dynamically decode the OBD2 responses received from the vehicle. Our OBD2 PID overview tool is a valuable resource for this purpose, providing a convenient way to explore and utilize OBD2 PIDs.

OBD2 PID overview tool

Practical OBD2 Data Logging and Decoding

In this section, we’ll walk through a practical example of how to log and decode OBD2 data using a CANedge CAN bus data logger. The CANedge is a versatile device that can be configured to transmit custom CAN frames, making it well-suited for OBD2 data logging applications.

The CANedge’s configurable transmit capabilities allow you to send OBD2 request messages to your vehicle and record the responses. To connect the CANedge to your vehicle’s OBD2 port, you can use an OBD2-DB9 adapter cable, which provides a convenient interface between the CANedge and the standard OBD2 connector.

Alt text: Diagram illustrating an OBD2 data logger setup using a CANedge, showing the data logger connected to the OBD2 port and transmitting PID requests (7DF) and receiving responses (7E8).

Alt text: Screenshot of a bit-rate validation test for OBD2 communication, showing successful CAN frame transmission at 500K using a CANedge data logger.
Alt text: Screenshot from asammdf software showing OBD2 PID validation test responses, displaying data received in response to ‘Supported PIDs’ requests.

Step #1: Bit-Rate, ID, and Supported PID Validation

As previously discussed, ISO 15765-4 outlines a procedure for determining the correct bit rate and CAN IDs used by a specific vehicle for OBD2 communication. You can use the CANedge data logger to perform these validation steps as follows (refer to the CANedge Intro for detailed instructions):

Bit-Rate Test: Begin by sending a CAN frame at a bit rate of 500 Kbps using the CANedge. Monitor for successful transmission (absence of CAN error frames). If transmission is unsuccessful, repeat the test at 250 Kbps.
Bit-Rate Confirmation: Once successful transmission is achieved at either 500 Kbps or 250 Kbps, use the identified bit rate for all subsequent OBD2 communication with the vehicle.
Supported PID Request: Send multiple ‘Supported PIDs’ requests (Mode 0x01 PID 0x00, PID 0x20, PID 0x40, etc.) using the CANedge to query the vehicle’s ECUs for supported PIDs.
Response Analysis: Review the responses received from the vehicle in a CAN bus analysis software like asammdf. Analyze the response CAN IDs to determine if the vehicle is using 11-bit or 29-bit CAN IDs for OBD2 communication.
Supported PID Identification: Examine the data bytes in the responses to identify the specific PIDs supported by the vehicle. The response data will typically be in the form of bitmasks indicating PID support ranges.

We provide pre-configured CANedge configurations to streamline these validation tests, making it easier to get started.

In most non-electric vehicles manufactured in 2008 or later, you can typically expect to find support for 40-80 PIDs, utilizing a 500 Kbps bit rate, 11-bit CAN IDs, and the OBD2/OBDonEDS protocol.

As illustrated in the asammdf GUI screenshot, it’s common to observe multiple responses to a single OBD request, particularly for ‘Supported PIDs’ requests. This is because the functional addressing CAN ID 0x7DF is used, which broadcasts the request to all OBD2-compliant ECUs. Since all compliant ECUs must support Service 0x01 PID 0x00, multiple ECUs often respond to this initial request. As you progress to subsequent ‘Supported PIDs’ requests (e.g., for PID ranges beyond 0x00-0x20), you’ll typically observe fewer ECUs responding, as PID support varies across ECUs. Note that the ECM (Engine Control Module) ECU, identified by CAN ID 0x7E8, often supports a comprehensive set of PIDs, including all PIDs supported by other ECUs in the vehicle. Therefore, to reduce bus load and streamline communication, you can optimize subsequent requests by using ‘Physical Addressing’ CAN IDs (e.g., 0x7E0 for ECM) to target specific ECUs directly, rather than using the broadcast functional addressing ID.

Step #2: Configuring OBD2 PID Requests for Logging

Once you have validated the bit rate, CAN IDs, and identified the PIDs supported by your vehicle, you can proceed to configure the CANedge to log specific OBD2 data parameters of interest. This involves creating a transmit list within the CANedge configuration, specifying the OBD2 requests you want to send to the vehicle.

Here are some key considerations when configuring your OBD2 PID requests for logging:

CAN ID Addressing: For efficient and targeted data retrieval, switch from using the functional addressing request ID (0x7DF) to ‘Physical Addressing’ request IDs (e.g., 0x7E0 for ECM) to direct requests to specific ECUs and avoid redundant responses.
Request Spacing: Introduce a delay of 300-500 milliseconds between consecutive OBD2 requests in your transmit list. Excessively rapid requests (spamming the ECUs) can sometimes cause ECUs to become unresponsive or limit their responses. Proper spacing ensures reliable communication.
Battery Drain Management: To prevent excessive battery drain, especially during extended logging sessions, consider implementing triggers in your CANedge configuration to stop OBD2 request transmission when the vehicle is inactive (e.g., ignition off). This avoids unnecessary ECU wake-up and battery drain.
Data Filtering: If your vehicle also broadcasts OEM-specific CAN data on the OBD2 port in addition to OBD2 responses, configure filters in your CANedge to selectively record only the OBD2 response CAN IDs (e.g., 0x7E8, 0x7E9, etc.). This reduces data logging volume and focuses your recordings on the relevant OBD2 data.

Once you have configured your transmit list with the desired OBD2 PID requests and optimized your CANedge settings, the device is ready to log raw OBD2 data from your vehicle.

Alt text: Example CANedge transmit list configuration for OBD2 PID requests, showing a list of PIDs (Vehicle Speed, RPM, Coolant Temperature, etc.) configured for periodic transmission.

Alt text: Screenshot from asammdf software showing decoded and visualized OBD2 data, plotted as time series graphs, demonstrating data interpretation using a DBC file.

Step #3: DBC Decoding of Raw OBD2 Data for Analysis

To effectively analyze and visualize the logged raw OBD2 data, you need to decode it into human-readable ‘physical values’ (e.g., km/h, degrees Celsius, RPM). This decoding process involves converting the raw data bytes in the CAN frames into meaningful units using scaling factors, offsets, and data type interpretations defined in the OBD2 standards.

The necessary decoding information for standardized OBD2 PIDs is specified in ISO 15031-5/SAE J1979 and is also often available in online resources like Wikipedia and OBD2 documentation websites. To simplify the decoding process, we provide a free OBD2 DBC file (https://www.csselectronics.com/pages/obd2-dbc-file). This DBC file is designed to work with most CAN bus software tools that support DBC decoding, including asammdf. DBC (CAN database) files provide a standardized way to define CAN message structures, signal names, data types, scaling, and units, making it easy to decode raw CAN data into physical values. Refer to resources like our CAN bus introduction for detailed information on DBC decoding.

Decoding OBD2 data presents a slightly greater complexity compared to decoding regular CAN signals. This is primarily because different OBD2 PIDs are often transmitted using the same CAN ID (e.g., 0x7E8 for ECM responses). Therefore, the CAN ID alone is not sufficient to uniquely identify the specific signal encoded in the payload. To accurately decode OBD2 data, you need to consider not only the CAN ID but also the OBD2 mode and OBD2 PID within the message payload. This technique is known as ‘extended multiplexing’. In extended multiplexing, additional information within the message payload (in this case, the OBD2 mode and PID) is used to disambiguate and correctly interpret the signals. DBC files can be designed to handle extended multiplexing scenarios, allowing software tools to correctly decode OBD2 data based on the combination of CAN ID, mode, and PID.

CANedge: Your Dedicated OBD2 Data Logger

The CANedge (https://www.csselectronics.com/pages/can-bus-hardware-products) offers a streamlined solution for recording OBD2 data. This compact and robust data logger allows you to easily record OBD2 data directly to a removable 8-32 GB SD card. Simply connect the CANedge to your vehicle’s OBD2 port (e.g., using an OBD2-DB9 adapter cable), configure your desired OBD2 logging parameters, and start recording. The logged data can then be easily accessed from the SD card and decoded using free software tools and APIs (https://www.csselectronics.com/pages/can-bus-software-api-tools) along with our OBD2 DBC file (https://www.csselectronics.com/pages/obd2-dbc-file).

OBD2 logger intro CANedge

OBD2 Multi-Frame Communication Examples: ISO-TP in Action

As previously discussed, OBD2 communication leverages the ISO-TP (ISO 15765-2) transport protocol to handle data payloads that exceed the 8-byte CAN frame limit. While many OBD2 examples involve single-frame communication, certain diagnostic services and data parameters necessitate multi-frame communication. In this section, we’ll examine examples of multi-frame OBD2 communication scenarios.

Multi-frame OBD2 communication inherently requires the use of flow control frames as defined by ISO-TP (refer to our UDS introduction for details on flow control). Flow control frames are used to manage the data flow and ensure reliable multi-frame message exchange between the diagnostic tool and the vehicle ECU. In practice, a common approach to handle flow control in OBD2 multi-frame requests is to transmit a static flow control frame (e.g., a ‘ContinueToSend’ frame) approximately 50 milliseconds after sending the initial request frame. This pre-emptive flow control approach can simplify implementation in some cases.

Analyzing multi-frame OBD2 responses requires CAN software and API tools that provide ISO-TP support. Tools like the CANedge MF4 decoders (https://www.csselectronics.com/pages/mdf4-decoders-dbc-mf4-parquet-csv) are designed to handle ISO-TP segmentation, reassembly, and flow control, enabling you to correctly process and decode multi-frame OBD2 messages.

Alt text: Example of an OBD2 multi-frame request message for Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), showing the initial request frame and subsequent flow control and data frames.

Example 1: Retrieving the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) via OBD2

The Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) is a crucial piece of vehicle information, relevant to telematics applications, vehicle diagnostics, parts identification, and more. OBD2 provides a standardized way to retrieve the VIN using diagnostic service Mode 0x09 and PID 0x02. Refer to our introduction to UDS for more context on VIN retrieval and its applications.

To retrieve the VIN using OBD2 requests, you initiate a request with Mode 0x09 (Request vehicle information) and PID 0x02 (Vehicle Identification Number).

The diagnostic tool sends a Single Frame request with the PCI field set to 0x02 (indicating a Single Frame), the request service identifier set to 0x09 (Mode 0x09), and the PID set to 0x02.

The vehicle ECU responds with a First Frame (FF), indicating the start of a multi-frame response. The First Frame contains the PCI field, the total length of the multi-frame response (e.g., 0x014 = 20 bytes in this example), the mode (0x49, which is 0x09 + 0x40 for a response to Mode 0x09), and the PID (0x02). Following the PID in the payload is the byte 0x01, which represents the Number Of Data Items (NODI). In this case, NODI is 1, indicating that there is one VIN being returned. The remaining 17 bytes of the multi-frame response contain the actual VIN data. The VIN is encoded as a series of ASCII characters represented in hexadecimal format. You can translate these hexadecimal bytes to ASCII characters using methods discussed in our introduction to UDS to obtain the human-readable VIN string.

Example 2: OBD2 Multi-PID Request (Requesting 6 PIDs in One Request)

OBD2 standards allow diagnostic tools to request up to 6 Mode 0x01 OBD2 PIDs in a single request frame. This capability, known as a multi-PID request, can improve data acquisition efficiency by reducing the number of request messages needed to retrieve multiple parameters. When a multi-PID request is sent, the vehicle ECU is expected to respond with data for all supported PIDs included in the request. If a requested PID is not supported by the ECU, the ECU simply omits the data for that PID from the response. The ECU may respond with the data across multiple frames using ISO-TP if the total response payload exceeds 7 bytes.

This multi-PID request feature can be advantageous for increasing data acquisition frequency and efficiency, but it also introduces complexities in data interpretation. The signal encoding within the multi-frame response becomes specific to the structure of your multi-PID request. This can make the use of generic OBD2 DBC files more challenging, as the data layout in the response is not fixed but depends on the combination of PIDs you requested. Therefore, using generic OBD2 DBC files for decoding multi-PID responses may not be straightforward. In practice, we generally do not recommend using multi-PID requests for general OBD2 data logging unless you are working with a toolchain that specifically supports and handles multi-PID response decoding. However, to illustrate the concept, an example trace of a multi-PID request and response is provided below:

The multi-frame response to a multi-PID request is similar in structure to the VIN example, but with the added complexity that the payload includes data for multiple PIDs. The payload typically contains the requested PIDs themselves, followed by the corresponding data values for each PID. In the example trace, the PIDs in the response are generally ordered in the same sequence as they were requested in the initial request message. While this ordering is common in practice, it’s important to note that the ISO 15031-5 standard does not strictly mandate this specific ordering.

Decoding multi-PID responses using generic DBC files can be very difficult in practice due to the variable data layout and the dependence on the specific PIDs requested. Therefore, we generally advise against using this approach for practical data logging scenarios unless you are working with specialized tools that have built-in support for multi-PID response decoding. Effectively, multi-PID responses introduce a more complex form of extended multiplexing, where the payload structure depends on the request. To handle this, your DBC file would need to account for the specific payload position of each PID in the multi-PID response, which can be challenging to generalize across different vehicles and PID combinations. Furthermore, if you are sending multiple different multi-PID requests, distinguishing between the responses and correctly associating them with the corresponding requests becomes even more complex, making pure DBC-based decoding impractical.

Workarounds for decoding multi-PID responses might involve custom scripting or software logic that combines the interpretation of response messages with the knowledge of the original request message structure. For example, a script could be designed to parse the response payload based on the sequence of PIDs in the corresponding request message. However, such approaches are generally complex to implement and manage at scale, especially when dealing with diverse vehicle types and diagnostic tools.

Example 3: Retrieving Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) via OBD2

OBD2 provides a standardized mechanism for retrieving emissions-related Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) using Mode 0x03 (Show stored Diagnostic Trouble Codes). In a Mode 0x03 request, no PID is included in the request payload. When an ECU receives a Mode 0x03 request, it responds with a list of DTCs that it has currently stored, if any. The response payload begins with a byte indicating the number of DTCs stored by that ECU. If no DTCs are stored, the count byte will be 0. Each DTC is represented by 2 data bytes in the response payload. Therefore, if an ECU has multiple DTCs stored, the response message will likely require multi-frame communication via ISO-TP to accommodate the entire list of DTCs.

The 2-byte DTC value is typically structured into two parts according to ISO 15031-5 and ISO 15031-6 standards. The first 2 bits of the first byte define the ‘category’ or system area to which the DTC pertains (e.g., Powertrain, Body, Chassis, Network). The remaining 14 bits (from the last 6 bits of the first byte and all 8 bits of the second byte) define a 4-digit code that uniquely identifies the specific fault. This 4-digit code is usually displayed in hexadecimal format. To obtain a human-readable description of a DTC, you can use various OBD2 DTC lookup tools, such as the chart available at repairpal.com. These tools allow you to enter the DTC code and retrieve a description of the fault, potential causes, and possible repair actions.

The example below illustrates a scenario where a diagnostic tool sends a Mode 0x03 request to an ECU that has 6 DTCs stored.

Alt text: Diagram illustrating OBD2 DTC (Diagnostic Trouble Code) decoding, showing the 2-byte DTC structure, category bits, code bits, and the process of looking up DTC descriptions in a DTC lookup tool.

Real-World Applications: OBD2 Data Logging Use Cases

OBD2 data, readily accessible from cars and light trucks, has a wide array of practical applications across various industries and use cases. Here are some prominent examples:

Vehicle Data Logging for Cars

OBD2 data logging in passenger cars provides valuable insights for diverse purposes, including:

Fuel Efficiency Optimization: Analyzing OBD2 parameters like fuel consumption, engine load, and speed can help drivers and fleet managers identify inefficient driving habits and optimize fuel consumption, leading to reduced fuel costs.
Driver Behavior Improvement: OBD2 data can be used to monitor driving behavior, such as harsh braking, acceleration, and speeding. This information can be used for driver training and feedback programs to promote safer and more efficient driving styles.
Prototype Testing and Validation: Automotive engineers and suppliers use OBD2 data logging during prototype vehicle testing to validate new components, systems, and software under real-world driving conditions.
Usage-Based Insurance (UBI): Insurance companies utilize OBD2 data to assess driving risk and offer personalized insurance premiums based on actual driving behavior and vehicle usage, promoting safer driving and potentially lowering insurance costs for good drivers.

obd2 logger

Real-Time Vehicle Diagnostics and Monitoring

OBD2 interfaces and real-time data streaming capabilities enable:

On-the-Fly Diagnostics: Mechanics and technicians can use OBD2 interfaces to stream human-readable OBD2 data in real-time during vehicle inspections and repairs, facilitating faster and more accurate diagnosis of vehicle issues.
Performance Monitoring: Car enthusiasts and performance tuners can use real-time OBD2 data to monitor engine performance parameters, track vehicle performance metrics, and optimize tuning adjustments.

obd2 streaming

Predictive Maintenance and Fleet Management

Integrating OBD2 data with IoT (Internet of Things) and cloud technologies enables:

Predictive Maintenance: OBD2 data streamed from vehicles to the cloud can be analyzed using algorithms and machine learning to predict potential vehicle breakdowns and component failures before they occur. This allows for proactive maintenance scheduling, reducing downtime and repair costs.
Fleet Management and Telematics: Fleet operators can leverage OBD2 data from their vehicle fleets for real-time vehicle tracking, driver monitoring, fuel management, and remote diagnostics. This improves fleet efficiency, reduces operational costs, and enhances vehicle uptime.

predictive maintenance

Vehicle Black Box and Data Recording for Disputes and Warranty

OBD2 data loggers can serve as a ‘black box’ for vehicles and equipment, providing:

Accident Reconstruction and Dispute Resolution: In the event of accidents or disputes, recorded OBD2 data can provide objective evidence of vehicle speed, braking, acceleration, and other parameters leading up to and during the event, aiding in accident reconstruction and dispute resolution.
Warranty Validation and Fraud Prevention: OBD2 data logging can be used to verify vehicle operating conditions and mileage for warranty claims and prevent odometer fraud.

can bus blackbox

Do you have a specific OBD2 data logging use case in mind? Reach out to us for a free consultation and expert guidance!

For more in-depth introductions to CAN bus and related technologies, explore our extensive guides section or download our comprehensive ‘Ultimate Guide’ PDF (https://www.csselectronics.com/pages/can-bus-ultimate-guide).

Ready to start logging or streaming OBD2 data?

Get your OBD2 data logger or interface today!

Buy now Contact us

Recommended Resources

OBD2 DATA LOGGER: EASILY LOG & CONVERT OBD2 DATA

CANEDGE2 – PRO CAN IoT LOGGER

[